|
You may have read Dennis McCarthy's article in the Oregonian on November 13th, his corrections on November 16th and/or the anonymous flyer titled "Beavercreek Wakeup." You may have also read the Oregonian's "You Make The Call" survey request in the November 16th issue and the results of that survey in the November 26th issue. If you have read any or all of the above and are wondering what's going on, this month's "Beavercreek Bulletin" feature article will try to clarify current Beavercreek issues.
In 1997, Metro identified 70 "Areas" around its boundary to utilize for urban growth in the next 40 years…you've probably heard of the 204O plan. Of those 70 Areas, 17 were identified as tier 1 Areas totaling approximately 4,500 acres leaving 53 Areas as tier 2 Areas totaling approximately 14,000 acres.
It is estimated that tier 1 Areas will be brought into Metro's boundary in the next 1 to 5 years. It is also estimated that tier 2 Areas may be brought into Metro's boundary in the next 2 to 20 years.
Two of these tier 2 "Areas" include the Beavercreek area... Area 25 (1,048 acres from Oregon City's southern boundary to approximately Wilson Road) and Area 26 (2,144 acres from approximately Wilson Road south to approximately Carus Road).
It is our understanding that Area 25 was included at the request of the Oregon City Council and Area 26 was included at the request of Metro Councilman John Kvistad.
Having lands included in Metro's Urban Growth Boundary Reserve does two things. First, it freezes the Areas from any zoning changes and any annexation. Second, it targets the Areas for future, densified urbanization.
On September 10, 1997, a Beavercreek community meeting was held. Two volunteer member committees were formed - the Beavercreek Committee for Community Planning (BCCP) and the Keep Beavercreek Rural. The objectives for each were:
BCCP - to educate itself and then educate
the citizens of Beavercreek regarding
their options for representation and
planning and decision making authority.
KBR - to utilize the intervention process in
an attempt to remove areas 25 and 26 as
Urban Growth Boundary Reserves.
In March of 1998, the BCCP held three community meetings to share what it had learned. A survey was taken and of the surveys returned, 72% asked the BCCP to pursue bringing the incorporation of Beavercreek as a city to election. Incorporating and running Beavercreek as a city is a huge responsibility, however, it would allow representation of Beavercreek at all levels of government, the ability of Beavercreek citizens to study, plan, implement and control its own destiny, and it would stop future annexation of Beavercreek by Oregon City.
In order to bring incorporation to election there are several requirements… a petition, budget and economic
|
|